| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Beaver Retriever
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
44
   |
Posted - 2013.04.12 19:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Buhhdust Princess wrote:So now we've:
1) Removed the 8th low slot of every Amarr Battleship
and
2) Removed 1% of the extra resist that would of probably kept them balanced.
Personally, I don't see a need to remove that 1%, I was killing Amarr perfectly fine.
Also, doing it to capitals is silly, it's a lot of time/effort to build them, and a lot of ISK to buy them. Removing a percentage of their bonuses just seems a bit dodgy.
It's not even 1%.. it's 5%. which is a massive, massive chunk of the advantage the Aeon and Archon have.
Might have to rethink my capital alt plans. Luckily, at least you won't need racial BS V to steer away from ****** capital training after the summer. |
Beaver Retriever
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 19:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Luc Chastot wrote:How does this change the fact active tanking bonuses are useless for fleets, thus completely wasted? Also, how does this change the fact Gallente has 4 ships with an almost useless bonus, while Minmatar has only 3?
So, what I'm seeing here is that not only have Caldari and Amarr plenty of ships with the better bonus, but also Gallente is in a worse position than Minmatar, while also having to deal with blasters' range and drones.
Edit: Yay.
They aren't 'wasted', that just means there's fleet ships and there's gang ships.
Not every ship has to be useful in a 200-man fleet. And not every ship has to be useful in a 6-man gang. There's roles. What's wrong with variety? |
Beaver Retriever
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 21:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ereilian wrote:
While Foz has a decent record of being on the level, there is serious discontent brewing that these changes are specifically PVP and take no account of PVE usage of the ships involved.
You cannot balance based on PVE in a PVP game.
Sorry, you're playing the part of Eve that was added as an afterthought so CCP could say 'we have PVE' on the box in 2003. It's not the game. |
| |
|